Skip to content

The great majority of Pennsylvania’s legislative contests will effectively conclude during the primary elections.

Multitudes of voters spanning the political spectrum will find themselves with limited options this year regarding their representation in the state House and Senate, owing to a scarcity of fiercely contested state legislative districts combined with Pennsylvania’s closed primary system.

This amalgamation entrusts the ultimate authority over the legislature and its policy direction to a diminutive minority of the populace.

Merely 14% of the 228 seats up for contention this year are anticipated to witness genuine competition: 29 in the state House and three in the state Senate. A mere 1.9 million out of Pennsylvania’s 8.7 million voters reside within these districts.

The individuals who will claim the lion’s share of seats will essentially be determined during the partisan, low-turnout primary elections transpiring on April 23. This is because the majority of legislative districts exhibit a pronounced partisan bias toward either Democrats or Republicans.

Dave’s Redistricting, an impartial website that scrutinizes political cartography, deems a district competitive if the partisan inclination falls between 44% and 54%; these percentages are derived from a composite of past electoral outcomes.

Pennsylvania also adopts a closed primary system, restricting participation in the spring elections solely to Democrats and Republicans. This disenfranchises a significant portion of the state’s 1.3 million unaffiliated and third-party voters from exerting meaningful influence over their representation in Harrisburg.

(Independents and third-party adherents can technically alter their registration to align with the primary they wish to engage in up until 15 days prior to the election, subsequently reverting to their original affiliation post-voting.)

At stake is the control of the 203-member state House and the 50-member state Senate (with only half of the latter’s seats up for grabs this year). The party commanding each chamber will dictate the legislative agenda to be prioritized or obstructed during the ensuing two-year term.

Democrats clinched a marginal state House majority in 2022 following over a decade of opposition. This triumph pivoted on a handful of contests decided by a mere few hundred ballots. Conversely, Republicans have maintained dominion over the state Senate for generations, although Democrats perceive an opportunity to at least deadlock the chamber.

Despite the considerable stakes, fewer voters are anticipated to wield significant influence over the balance of power compared to just a few years prior.

The count of competitive legislative districts in Pennsylvania diminished subsequent to the 2020 redistricting cycle, dwindling from 58 to 38.

The commission tasked with delineating the maps was compelled to adhere to specific constitutional mandates — including one stipulating equitable population distribution across districts — whilst grappling with demographic shifts.

Pennsylvania’s rural regions experienced depopulation, whereas urban and suburban areas witnessed growth. Individuals also tend to gravitate toward communities harboring congruent political ideologies, observed Chris Fowler, a geology professor at Penn State who contributed to former Democratic Governor Tom Wolf’s Redistricting Advisory Council.

This demographic phenomenon consolidates Democrats and Republicans within discrete enclaves across the state, rendering the crafting of competitive districts a more arduous endeavor.

“The phenomenon of sorting undeniably shapes the political topography,” remarked Fowler.

Where a ballot holds greater sway

Democrats and Republicans residing in districts strongly aligned with their party wield enhanced influence over the selection of their legislative representatives. These voters possess the prerogative to elect their lawmakers during primaries, events historically characterized by diminished turnout compared to general elections.

Consider state House District 100, represented by Minority Leader Bryan Cutler of Lancaster County. The district exhibits a pronounced Republican tilt.

In 2022, Cutler secured victory in the GOP primary with slightly over 6,100 votes in a district boasting 33,000 registered voters. Although he ran unopposed in November, his primary bid is currently encountering a challenge from within the party ranks.

A short distance to the east lies state House District 200, represented by Chris Rabb of Philadelphia. Its Democratic lean is amongst the most conspicuous in the state, standing at 96%.

In 2022, the district counted 51,000 registered voters. Just over 18,000 Democrats participated in the primary contest that witnessed Rabb facing off against then-Representative Isabella Fitzgerald; both incumbents were amalgamated into the same district during the redistricting process.

Rabb emerged victorious in the primary with 62% of the vote before comfortably securing re-election against a Republican challenger. His triumph in this year’s primary is assured, as he faces no opposition.

The state’s competitive districts are predominantly concentrated in the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh suburbs. General election skirmishes in some of these districts have been decided by a slim margin of just a few dozen or a few hundred votes, endowing voters across the political spectrum with a vested interest in these contests. Turnout assumes pivotal importance in such races, as each cast ballot possesses the potential to influence the outcome.

This scenario materialized in state House District 144 in 2022, where Democratic Representative Brian Munroe prevailed over Republican incumbent Todd Polinchock by a margin of 515 votes. Nearly 70% of registered voters participated.

Of the 25 state Senate districts subject to electoral scrutiny this year — which haven’t undergone electoral testing since the boundaries were redrawn in 2022 — merely three are deemed competitive.

Among them is District 37, presently represented by Republican Senator Devlin Robinson of Allegheny County. It exhibits a Democratic bias of 53% and is a prime target as Democrats endeavor to wrest control of the chamber.

In 2022, Robinson defeated Democratic incumbent Pam Iovino by a margin exceeding 7,000 votes. In the forthcoming general election, he will contend with Democrat Nicole Ruscitto, a librarian and former member of the Jefferson Hills borough council.

Of the district’s in excess of 181,000 voters, 15% are independent or affiliated with a third party. This translates to roughly 28,000 individuals whose votes could potentially sway the election outcome.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *